<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britishers were intelligent enough to follow Lord Macauley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/</link>
	<description>Yet more clitches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>I guess you understand that the compulsions behind using English.

Culture? The problem is not in adopting English culture, the problem is that some Indians hate Indian culture, if not &#039;hate&#039; they feel worse-off saying that they belong to Indian Culture. They wouldn&#039;t talk about discovery of zero, they wouldn&#039;t talk about &quot;Ramanujan&quot;. Thats the problem I am addressing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you understand that the compulsions behind using English.</p>
<p>Culture? The problem is not in adopting English culture, the problem is that some Indians hate Indian culture, if not &#8216;hate&#8217; they feel worse-off saying that they belong to Indian Culture. They wouldn&#8217;t talk about discovery of zero, they wouldn&#8217;t talk about &#8220;Ramanujan&#8221;. Thats the problem I am addressing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bheekling</title>
		<link>http://rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>bheekling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rohitj.net/blog/2007/11/12/britishers-were-intelligent-enough-to-follow-lord-macauley/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>And the fact that you&#039;re writing this post in English is a mark of the extent of their success.

In any case, if someone in today&#039;s day and age tries to stick purely to their culture, they will be left far behind. The best way out is to do both; learn your own culture, and the global culture which is now emerging.

Of course, &quot;global culture&quot; is the exact anti-thesis of American culture whose main features are arrogance, stupidity, racism and wastage of resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the fact that you&#8217;re writing this post in English is a mark of the extent of their success.</p>
<p>In any case, if someone in today&#8217;s day and age tries to stick purely to their culture, they will be left far behind. The best way out is to do both; learn your own culture, and the global culture which is now emerging.</p>
<p>Of course, &#8220;global culture&#8221; is the exact anti-thesis of American culture whose main features are arrogance, stupidity, racism and wastage of resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
